Cheating Case Against Mike Postle & Stones Gambling Hall Dismissed

Last Updated on June 5, 2020 Author:Gabrielle Monet

Mike Postle, Stones Gambling Hall & Justin KuraitisMike Postle, the player at the center of a massive cheating scandal which made headlines in the world of poker in 2019, is now officially off the hook after United States District Judge William B. Shubb decided to junk a multi-million lawsuit filed against him, citing California law.

The judge also granted motions to dismiss to the two other defendants in the case, California poker venue Stones Gambling Hall, and tournament director Justin Kuraitis, but the plaintiffs were still given a chance to file an amended complaint against them.

The shocking dismissal was granted on June 3 by Judge Shubb after hearing oral arguments from all parties in mid-May. Postle was accused of cheating during livestreamed cash games at Stones, allegedly profiting around $250,000 in the process. He allegedly carried out the act with the aid of a “confederate“, widely believed to be Kuraitis.

In making his ruling, the judge favored the defendants in their main argument that gambling disputes cannot have judicial remedy in the state of California, partly due to the fact that the “asserted damages are inherently speculative“. Judge Shubb based his decision on previous case law, Kelly v. First Astri Corp.

The judge added that the claims made by the plaintiffs are “quintessential gambling losses” that cannot be recovered in accordance with California public policy. This “mandates the dismissal with prejudice” of allegations made against Postle, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and unjust enrichment. Judge Shubb also wrote that while some states have granted statutory right for the recovery of gambling losses, the same hasn’t been done in California.

Similarly, the judge also outrightly dismissed a request for sanctions filed against Postle for allegedly using a ghostwriter to craft his motions, as well as an additional charge in relation to the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), citing that gambling losses do not qualify as sufficient injury to business or property.

Cased Against Stones, Kuraitis Junked

Allegations of fraud, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, against Stones, as well as libel claims made by whistleblower Veronica Brill against the gambling venue, were also dismissed.

Judge Shubb said the fraud allegations are nothing more than a general allegation which failed to specify the cost of the rake during each game, and the individual contribution of the players. The judge also sided with Stones when it argued that it did not owe a general duty of care to gamblers. Claims of negligent misrepresentation were weak, as the plaintiffs did not disclose the identity of Postle’s alleged accomplice.

Mac VerStandig, lawyers for the plaintiffs, expressed his disappointment at the ruling, and hinted that they will file an amended complaint. Postle has yet to issue any comment on the recent ruling.

  Contact Me

Gabrielle is our resident French author, as well as managing our French site she specialises in breaking the latest European poker stories whether related to France or not.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments